In 2011 I was at my first hackathon event. I was very excited, this great successful company was coming to our country and hosting a hackathon! The company was Yahoo!, I know, things don't look so shiny and bright today but it was a big deal back then.
During that event I developed (together with some friends) a fun little snake multiplayer game which, like all hackathon by-products, was promptly abandoned the day after.
The game was written in Node.js, and it was the first time I was writing backend JS, even though I was a true enthusiast back then.
A couple of years later I wanted to revisit the game just to see how bad it really was. I, unfortunately, had an issue: we had never versioned the packages, so everything was outdated and nothing worked. Changes from one version to the next tended to be bigger. I've decided that it was time to rebuild it, just for fun.
It was the end of 2015, the Paris agreement was going to stop pollution, Volkswagen was found guilty of cheating the pollutions emissions tests, and I was refactoring "Tequila worms".
While TypeScript offered static types which allowed it to find some bugs at compilation instead of runtime, CoffeeScript had a much more "code" orientated approach. CoffeeScript allowed for a simpler and nicer syntax. I agree, it was a bit confusing at first, but it looked great!
The decision was made, the backend will be built in CoffeeScript, it was an obviously better choice than TypeScript.
For the frontend there were several options, but I was not going to use jQuery as there were all these new shiny frameworks available. The question was: should I use React or Angular?
I strongly believed that a frontend library should not use backend for complication. Angular with its version 1, which denoted stability was a favorite! It had a stable version, so it wasn't going to change very soon, it had a good community behind it, and it was built by Google!
React on the other hand wasn't that popular. It also needed backend to compile, which is kind of weird if you think about it, it was build by Facebook, and had a very different approach than the more popular MVC.
Angular (version 1) and CoffeeScript were the winners! I can say that it was a pleasure refactoring this silly game and, above all, I was able to use these cutting edge technologies, making the project future-proof!
You can find the end result here: https://github.com/claudiu-persoiu/tequila-worms/
8 years later
The Paris agreement didn't really change the world as radically as we needed it to, Volkswagen is making electrical and hybrid cars now, and my app doesn't look like state of the art anymore.
As Node.js has matured, its dependencies also become increasingly more complex and in need of constant attention.
On the other hand, Angular was completely refactored in version 2 and my dream of building frontend without the need for backend is becoming a more literal dream.
CoffeeScript script was slowly taken over by TypeScript, and is now closer to a piece of history for enthusiasts then a go-to language.
On CoffeeScript's Wikipedia page, under "Adoption", there's a phrase that describes very well what has become of it:
While Node.js was the only good pick in the project stack, the rest of them only prove that you should not take technical advice from people on the Internet, in this particularly case me, I was just so far off...
On the other hand, none of the technologies were a bad decision at the time, and building frontend without the need of backend wasn't the eccentric desire it may seem today.
CoffeeScript was just unlucky, while it made the syntax nicer, it made it a bit harder for people coming from C family languages to understand it.
While the TypeScript syntax is not nicer, it does help with static type checking.
I guess the main takeaways of this story are that there's no future-proof when you rely on frameworks and that you shouldn't trust anyone's predictions, especially not mine.